<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for the book of disquiet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.doubt2.org/bookofdisquiet/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.doubt2.org/bookofdisquiet</link>
	<description>fernando pessoa (1888-1935)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:52:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 013 by annap</title>
		<link>http://blogs.doubt2.org/bookofdisquiet/?p=4&#038;cpage=1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>annap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 10:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.doubt2.org/bookofdisquiet/?p=4#comment-2</guid>
		<description>&quot;On close inspection, all literature is probably a version of the
apocalypse that seems to me rooted, no matter what its sociohistorical
conditions might be, on the fragile border (borderline cases) where
identities (subject/object, etc.) do not exist or only barely
so—double, fuzzy, heterogeneous, animal, metamorphosed, altered,
abject&quot;. According to Kristeva, literature explores the way that
language is structured over a lack, a want. She privileges poetry, in
particular, because of poetry&#039;s willingness to play with grammar,
metaphor and meaning, thus laying bear the fact that language is at
once arbitrary and limned with the abject fear of loss: &quot;Not a
language of the desiring exchange of messages or objects that are
transmitted in a social contract of communication and desire beyond
want, but a language of want, of the fear that edges up to it and runs
along its edges&quot;.
http://www.cla.purdue.edu/english/theory/psychoanalysis/kristevaabjectmain.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On close inspection, all literature is probably a version of the<br />
apocalypse that seems to me rooted, no matter what its sociohistorical<br />
conditions might be, on the fragile border (borderline cases) where<br />
identities (subject/object, etc.) do not exist or only barely<br />
so—double, fuzzy, heterogeneous, animal, metamorphosed, altered,<br />
abject&#8221;. According to Kristeva, literature explores the way that<br />
language is structured over a lack, a want. She privileges poetry, in<br />
particular, because of poetry&#8217;s willingness to play with grammar,<br />
metaphor and meaning, thus laying bear the fact that language is at<br />
once arbitrary and limned with the abject fear of loss: &#8220;Not a<br />
language of the desiring exchange of messages or objects that are<br />
transmitted in a social contract of communication and desire beyond<br />
want, but a language of want, of the fear that edges up to it and runs<br />
along its edges&#8221;.<br />
<a href="http://www.cla.purdue.edu/english/theory/psychoanalysis/kristevaabjectmain.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cla.purdue.edu/english/theory/psychoanalysis/kristevaabjectmain.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
